David Lusty
To what extent is lawfully compelled self-incrimination prior to trial, and the use and admissibility of compelled evidence and derivative evidence, compatible with the common law accusatorial system of criminal trial, human rights and Chapter III of the Australian Constitution?
Thesis
Coercive Powers & Criminal Justice: Lawfully Compelled Self-Incrimination and the Use of Compelled Evidence.
Supervisors
- Jill Hunter
- Lisa Crawford
Area of Interest
Criminal Investigation & Prosecution; Confiscation of Proceeds of Crime; Organised Crime; White-Collar Crime; Corruption.
- Publications
Publications
-
Lusty, 鈥淭est for Dishonesty in the United Kingdom Brought into Line with Australian Common Law鈥 (2017) 41 Criminal Law Journal 281.
Lusty, 鈥淩evival of the Common Law Offence of Misconduct in Public Office鈥 (2014) 38 Criminal Law Journal 337.
Lusty, 鈥淭he Meaning of Dishonesty in Australia鈥 (2012) 36 Criminal Law Journal 282.
Lusty, 鈥淢isconduct in Public Office鈥 (2009) 173 Criminal Law & Justice Weekly 437.
Lusty, 鈥淗ouse of Lords Rejects Anonymous Witnesses in Criminal Trials鈥 (2008) 32 Criminal Law Journal 316.
Lusty, 鈥淏ribery and Secret Commissions鈥 (2007) 14(10) Criminal Law News 18.
Lusty, 鈥淧roposed Witness Anonymity Laws Violate the Right to a Fair Trial and Arguably Infringe Chapter III of the Constitution鈥 (2004) 28 Criminal Law Journal 110.
Lusty, 鈥淚s There a Common Law Privilege Against Spouse-Incrimination?鈥 (2004) 27 University of New South Wales Law Journal 1.
Lusty, 鈥淭axing the Untouchables Who Profit From Organised Crime鈥 (2003) 10 Journal of Financial Crime 209.
Lusty, 鈥淐ivil Forfeiture of Proceeds of Crime in Australia鈥 (2002) 5 Journal of Money Laundering Control 345.
Lusty, 鈥淎nonymous Accusers: An Historical & Comparative Analysis of Secret Witnesses in Criminal Trials鈥 (2002) 24 Sydney Law Review 361.